Case 2502179/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Mehmood v Department for Work and Pensions — 2025
- Case reference
- 2502179/2024
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Mehmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre from 13 to 15 October 2025 before Employment Judge Langridge. The claimant was represented by a lay representative and the respondent by counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010, indirect disability discrimination under section 19, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 were not well-founded and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally, and the written record does not include further findings or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim of disability discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of indirect disability discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.