Case 2502200/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Graham v Cedar Group CIC — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502200/2023
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Graham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Newcastle by CVP on 14 December 2023, Employment Judge Loy sitting alone found that Mr N Graham's claim for unlawful deduction from wages was well-founded and that his claim for unpaid holiday pay was also well-founded. The tribunal did not record any discrimination or dismissal claim, and it dismissed the claimant's application for a preparation time order.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered Cedar Group CIC to pay Mr N Graham a total gross sum of £1,117.85. That figure was made up of £846.00 for unpaid wages, calculated as 75 hours at £11.28 per hour, and £271.85 for unpaid holiday pay, calculated as 24.1 hours accrued unpaid holiday at £11.28 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Found well-founded; remedy calculated as 75 hours (10 days unpaid wages x 7.5 hours per day) at £11.28 per hour. | Upheld | — | £846 |
| Holiday pay | Found well-founded; remedy calculated as 24.1 hours accrued unpaid holiday at £11.28 per hour. | Upheld | — | £272 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,118
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.