Case 2502205/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wilson v Chip and Pin Services UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502205/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11/10/2019, the Tribunal gave Mr S Wilson an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Johnson struck out the claim under rule 37. The decision records no merits findings on the underlying employment dispute and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 11/10/2019, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.