Case 2502210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms E Fish (2) Miss B Weldon v Sunshine Wood Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502210/2022
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms E Fish (2) Miss B Weldon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Ms E Fish's claims for unlawful deduction from wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay. It found that Sunshine Wood Limited had failed to pay her the full wages due for July and August 2022, with unauthorised deductions totalling £128.25 gross, and had failed to pay £1,842.05 gross of accrued holiday pay on termination. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,970.30 in total to Ms Fish.
The tribunal also upheld Miss B Weldon's claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay on termination. It found that Sunshine Wood Limited had failed to pay her £2,291.29 gross of holiday pay due on termination and ordered that sum to be paid. The written record does not record any other heads of loss or any reduction to the amounts claimed, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ms E Fish: unauthorised deductions from wages for July and August 2022, gross £128.25. | Upheld | — | £128 |
| Holiday pay | Ms E Fish: unpaid accrued holiday pay on termination, gross £1,842.05. | Upheld | — | £1,842 |
| Holiday pay | Miss B Weldon: unpaid accrued holiday pay on termination, gross £2,291.29. | Upheld | — | £2,291 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,262
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.