Case 2502212/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Gray v CF Motoring Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502212/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr L Gray's claim against CF Motoring Services Ltd at Newcastle by CVP on 6 and 7 December 2020, before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green. The written judgment record identifies the claim as one of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, alleged to arise because the claimant had made a protected disclosure.
The judgment states that the claim was dismissed. No separate written reasons are provided in the record; it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The written decision therefore records the outcome only, without a further factual or legal explanation in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records a claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to Employment Rights Act 1996, section 103A, on the basis that the reason for dismissal was a protected disclosure. The claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.