Case 2502222/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Limmer v Ncfe — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502222/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Limmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Johnson on 21 October 2020. The issue determined was whether the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal held that, at all material times, the claimant was not suffering from a disability as defined in section 6. On that basis, the claimant’s complaints of unlawful disability discrimination were dismissed. No monetary remedy was recorded, and the judgment does not record any substantive liability findings beyond the preliminary disability issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Decided at a public preliminary hearing on the issue of disability. The tribunal held that, at all material times, the claimant was not disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.