Case 2502224/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Fagan v Wefax Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502224/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Fagan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 May 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, had not been actively pursued, and might already have been dealt with by the tribunal under claim number 2502227/2022.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Arullendran struck out the claim on 28 June 2023. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying employment issues and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 5 May 2023 invited representations or a request for a hearing on the grounds that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, had not been actively pursued, and may already have been dealt with under claim number 2502227/2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.