Case 2502226/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Lisa Thompson v Wefax Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502226/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Lisa Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case on 20 March 2023 at Newcastle upon Tyne, listed to take place remotely by Cloud Video Platform, before Employment Judge Heather Appearances. The claimant, Lisa Thompson, attended and represented herself. Wefax Limited did not attend and was not represented. The second respondent, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, was represented by Mr Soni.
The written judgment states that the claims for unauthorised deduction of wages, non-payment of holiday pay, and redundancy pay were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded.
The record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text therefore does not include the tribunal's detailed reasoning for the dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment dismisses the claim for non-payment of holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment dismisses the claim for redundancy pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.