Case 2502227/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Karen Fagan v Wefax Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502227/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Karen Fagan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningKaren Fagan brought claims against Wefax Limited and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy for unauthorised deduction of wages, non-payment of holiday pay, and redundancy pay. The hearing took place on 20 March 2023 at the Employment Tribunal in Newcastle upon Tyne, listed to proceed remotely by Cloud Video Platform. The claimant attended and represented herself; the first respondent did not attend and was not represented; the second respondent was represented by Mr Soni.
Employment Judge Heather dismissed all three claims. The judgment records no separate monetary award and no findings in the written record beyond the dismissal of the claims for unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay, and redundancy pay. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not to be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.