Case 2502238/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Callum Fysh v Hedley Design Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502238/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Callum Fysh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCallum Fysh brought claims against Hedley Design Limited for unlawful deduction of wages, unpaid holiday pay on termination, and breach of contract arising from unpaid pension contributions. The respondent did not present a response, and the case was dealt with under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal noted that the claim form was served twice and that the claimant later provided further information by email about the sums claimed.
The tribunal found that, as at termination of employment, the claimant had not been paid gross salary of £1,474.36 for his last month of employment. It also found that he had accrued 20 days' annual leave but had taken 10 days, and on a gross daily rate of £88.46 he was entitled to £884.60 for untaken holiday pay. On the pension issue, the tribunal accepted the claimant's material from NEST and his later breakdown of the unpaid employee and employer contributions, totalling £1,908.85.
Satisfied that it had sufficient information to do so, the tribunal issued judgment without a hearing and held all three claims well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,474.36 for unlawful deduction of wages, £884.60 for holiday pay, and £1,908.85 in damages for breach of contract, making a total award of £4,267.81. The listed hearing on 1 March 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,474 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £885 |
| Breach of contract | Claim related to failure to pay employee and employer pension contributions to NEST. | Upheld | — | £1,909 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,268
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.