Case 2502240/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Young v Danick Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502240/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal held that the claimant's unauthorised deduction of wages claim was well-founded and succeeded. The respondent accepted liability to pay a sum equal to the claimant's gross pay for the period she would have been at work during her notice period, less the gross amount of statutory sick pay already paid to her in that period.
The judgment did not fix the amount payable. The parties were directed to confirm by 19 January 2024 whether they had reached agreement on the amount due. If they had not agreed the amount by that date, or if the tribunal did not hear from them by then, the claim was to be listed for a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was found well-founded and succeeded. The respondent accepted liability for a sum equal to the claimant's gross pay for the notice period less the gross statutory sick pay already paid, but the amount was not determined in this judgment and was to be agreed or listed for a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.