Case 2502243/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Cummings v Planet Citizens Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502243/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Cummings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment of Employment Judge Loy dated 11 January 2024. The tribunal recorded that Miss A Cummings had been dismissed in breach of contract because the respondent did not pay her for her notice period. It awarded damages of £2,340.00, calculated as 9 weeks' notice at £260 net per week.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination of employment. It ordered the gross sum of £560.00, calculated as 4 days' accrued holiday, being 40 hours at £14.00 per hour.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay a statutory redundancy payment. Paragraph 3 orders £3,780.04, while paragraph 4(c) sets out the calculation as £3,780.00 and paragraph 4 states a total of £6,680.00. The judgment therefore contains an internal discrepancy on the redundancy figure, but the operative result was that the claimant succeeded on all three claims and received a total award of £6,680.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay notice pay on termination and ordered damages of £2,340.00, calculated as 9 weeks' notice at £260 net per week. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination and ordered the gross sum of £560.00, calculated as 40 hours at £14.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay a statutory redundancy payment and ordered £3,780.04 in paragraph 3. Paragraph 4(c) sets out the calculation as £3,780.00 and paragraph 4 states a total of £6,680.00, so the judgment contains an internal discrepancy on this figure. | Upheld | — | £3,780 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,680
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.