Case 2502248/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Executor or Administrator of the Estate of the Late Mr Christopher Lawrey v EE Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502248/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Executor or Administrator of the Estate of the Late Mr Christopher Lawrey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 26 August 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 July 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the hearing listed for 27 September 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's 19 July 2021 order and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment text itself does not set out the underlying discrimination allegations; disability discrimination is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.