Case 2502259/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr GJ Dring v The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502259/2019
- Decision date
- 27 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr GJ Dring
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr GJ Dring, a registered nurse employed by Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust since 1998, remained on Whitley Council Scale E after he did not agree the Agenda for Change job description in 2007. The tribunal found that he continued on the Whitley Council contract for pay purposes until 6 September 2018, and rejected the argument that the use of Agenda for Change holiday calculations created a hybrid contract. After a career break he returned on 9 May 2018 on salary £22,725 and agreed the Band 5 job description on 6 June 2018.
Ms Mann applied section 46 of the Agenda for Change Handbook to assimilate him to Band 5. The tribunal held that section 46 remained the correct objective assimilation process, that the Trust did not have to seek advice from NHS England, and that Annex 2 did not supersede section 46. On the strict application of section 46, the claimant’s pre-assimilation salary should have taken him to the next equal or higher Band 5 point at £23,023, but Ms Mann exercised discretion to place him on step point 3 at £23,951 in light of his experience. The claimant resigned on 4 February 2019 before the grievance hearing, but the grievance nevertheless proceeded and Mr Dick confirmed the decision on 22 March 2019.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s case that he was contractually entitled to Band 5 point 8 at £29,608, including the submission that the word “appointment” in Annex 2 meant appointment as a nurse. It held that the decisions taken were not irrational or perverse, applying the authorities cited on the exercise of discretion. Both the breach of contract claim and the alternative unlawful deduction from wages claim were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed. The tribunal held that the claimant’s contractual entitlement on assimilation was to Band 5 step point 1 or 2 at £23,023, and that placing him on step point 3 at £23,951 was a permissible exercise of discretion and not a breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Alternative claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 dismissed for the same reasons as the contract claim; the tribunal found no underpayment beyond the claimant’s contractual entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Clark v Nomura International plc
- Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.