Case 2502269/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hannah v JR NEWCO 1 Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502269/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hannah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Hannah, succeeded on all three monetary claims against JR Newco 1 Limited. The tribunal found his claim for notice pay well-founded and ordered payment of £753.85 gross, subject to any deductions of tax and national insurance the respondent was required to make.
The tribunal also found well-founded the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered £3,316.94 gross, again subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. In addition, the claim for accrued and outstanding holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found well-founded, with an award of £134.62 gross on the same basis.
The total award recorded by the tribunal was £4,205.41. The respondent did not attend the hearing, which was held remotely by CVP, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment described this as a claim for notice pay and ordered £753.85 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £754 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim well-founded and ordered £3,316.94 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,317 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the accrued and outstanding holiday pay claim under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 well-founded and ordered £134.62 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,205
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.