Case 2502270/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Meachen v Andrew Hooper trading as Teesdale Restaurant and Coffee Shop — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502270/2022
- Decision date
- 24 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Meachen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss M Meachen's claim for a redundancy payment was well-founded. It awarded her a redundancy payment of £1,426.14.
The tribunal also found that her claim for accrued and outstanding holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded. It ordered the respondent, Andrew Hooper trading as Teesdale Restaurant and Coffee Shop, to pay £126.80 gross, subject to any deductions of tax and national insurance the respondent might be obliged to make.
The total award was £1,552.94.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was well-founded and awarded £1,426.14. | Upheld | — | £1,426 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for accrued and outstanding holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and ordered payment of £126.80 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance if required. | Upheld | — | £127 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,553
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.