Case 2502277/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Burke v Total Reclaim Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502277/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Burke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Burke brought claims against Total Reclaim Limited for breach of contract and under the Working Time Regulations. Employment Judge Sweeney sat alone at North Shields Hearing Centre on 4 October 2019. The judgment records that the breach of contract claim, which was for notice pay, was not well founded and was dismissed.
The Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations claim succeeded by consent. The tribunal recorded that this related to the Respondent's failure to pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. The parties agreed that the Claimant was entitled to one day's holiday pay in the sum of £63.46, and the Respondent was ordered to pay that gross amount.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was for notice pay and was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | By consent, the Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations claim succeeded in relation to payment in lieu of one day of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; the parties agreed the sum due was £63.46 gross. | Upheld | — | £63 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £63
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.