Case 2502282/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Richardson v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502282/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that, by letter dated 23 April 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 17 March 2021.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, had failed to make sufficient representations, or had failed to request a hearing. On that basis, it ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary remedy. It also states that the hearing listed for 6 to 9 December 2021 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the reasons section; it states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, following the Tribunal's letter of 23 April 2021 about non-compliance with the order dated 17 March 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.