Case 2502293/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Russell v Mental Health Matters — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502293/2022
- Decision date
- 15 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter remotely by video on 15 February 2023 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The claimant, Mr A Russell, appeared in person and the respondent, Mental Health Matters, was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant’s claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success. No substantive findings on the underlying merits are set out in the written record provided, and no award was made.
The respondent’s application for a deposit order was dismissed. The written record also notes that the hearing was remote because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable, no party requested one, and the issues could be determined remotely.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the legal cause of action; it records only that the claimant’s claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.