Case 2502297/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mahmood v Nurtured Health & Home Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2502297/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mahmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in public at Newcastle on 23 May 2025, before Employment Judge Heather, the tribunal recorded that the complaint of discrimination on the ground of religion or belief was dismissed upon withdrawal. No remedy arose from that complaint.
The tribunal also considered limitation for the unfair dismissal claim, the automatically unfair dismissal claim based on whistleblowing, and the protected disclosure detriment claim. It found that those claims had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present them in time. On that basis, each of those claims was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the discrimination (religion or belief) complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held that the automatically unfair dismissal (whistleblowing) claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held that the protected disclosure detriment (whistleblowing) claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.