Case 2502308/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Wilson v The Cleveland Police and Crime Commissioner and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502308/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Moss on 17 May 2023 in which the respondents applied for the claimant's claims to be struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and for deposit orders under Rule 39. The tribunal dismissed both applications.
No merits findings were made and no monetary award was ordered. The judgment therefore records only that the claims remained live after the preliminary hearing, with no determination of liability on the underlying discrimination allegations.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Underlying claim inferred from the case listing; at this preliminary hearing the tribunal only decided the respondents' applications to strike out and for deposit orders, both of which were dismissed. The merits of the discrimination claim were not determined. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Underlying claim inferred from the case listing; at this preliminary hearing the tribunal only decided the respondents' applications to strike out and for deposit orders, both of which were dismissed. The merits of the discrimination claim were not determined. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.