Case 2502329/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Russell v Student Loans Company HELD AT: Middlesbrough — 2022
- Case reference
- 2502329/2022
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Mrs C Hunter, Ms E Wiles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Russell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sitting at Middlesbrough before Employment Judge Aspden, with Mrs C Hunter and Ms E Wiles, made a unanimous judgment in Mrs J Russell's case against Student Loans Company. It struck out three Equality Act 2010 complaints as having been brought outside the time limits in section 123: the complaint about refusing to let the claimant work from her personal office, the complaint alleging refusal to allow or secure an occupational report on or about 8 February 2022, and the complaint that the respondent intrusively questioned the claimant on 8 March 2022.
The tribunal then stated that none of the claimant's other complaints were well founded and dismissed those complaints. The written record notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal struck out three Equality Act 2010 complaints as out of time under section 123: the complaint about the respondent refusing to let the claimant work from her personal office; the complaint alleging refusal to allow or secure an occupational report on or about 8 February 2022; and the complaint that the respondent intrusively questioned the claimant on 8 March 2022. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that none of the claimant's other complaints were well founded and that the complaints were dismissed. The short written record does not set out separate reasons for those remaining complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.