Case 2502332/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Veesamsetty v Bell Passi Restaurant — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502332/2023
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Veesamsetty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 December 2023, the Tribunal gave Mrs L Veesamsetty an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the complaints should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of breach of contract, holiday pay and wages. The hearing listed for 22 January 2024 was cancelled. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out after the Tribunal found the complaint had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out after the Tribunal found the complaint had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment uses the term 'wages'; mapped here to unlawful_deduction_wages on the basis of the case listing, but the judgment itself does not specify the statutory basis. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.