Case 2502348/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jardine v Bestway Wholesale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502348/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jardine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Garnon issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 on 10 February 2020. The judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mr D Jardine against Bestway Wholesale Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, facts, legal tests, or remedy. No monetary award or remedy breakdown is stated.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.