Case 2502353/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Matthews v W Hedley & Sons Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502353/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Matthews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Matthews was employed by W Hedley & Sons Ltd from 10 January 2018 until 1 October 2020, when he was dismissed by reason of redundancy. He presented a claim on 22 December 2020 for a statutory redundancy payment. The respondent filed a late response saying the employer was W Hedley & Sons Ltd, not William Hedley Senior, and that the claim was not defended. The claimant then confirmed the respondent’s identity and the claim form was amended accordingly.
The tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the available material. It was satisfied that it had enough information to determine the claim. The tribunal found that the claim for redundancy payment was presented in time under section 164 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy, having regard to the statutory presumption in section 163 ERA 1996, the information in the claim form, and the absence of a defence.
At the date of dismissal the claimant had been continuously employed for more than two years and was 25 years old. His gross weekly wage was £650, capped for redundancy purposes at £538. On that basis the tribunal held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,076. The hearing listed for 19 March 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the statutory redundancy payment claim was in time under section 164 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy within section 163 ERA 1996. The respondent was later confirmed as W Hedley & Sons Ltd and did not defend the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,076
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 164 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.