Case 2502371/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Rutter v HT Leisure Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502371/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Rutter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Rutter presented a claim against HT Leisure Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages, said to consist of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal sent notice of the claim to the respondent on 9 August 2019, but no response was presented.
Applying the Rule 21 procedure, Employment Judge Aspden recorded that the time for presenting a response had expired and that no valid response had been presented. On the information before the employment judge, the claim succeeded.
The tribunal ordered HT Leisure Limited to pay the claimant £976 gross. The judgment states that the sum is gross and that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance due on it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant presented a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not present a response, and the claim succeeded on the information before the employment judge. | Upheld | — | £976 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £976
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.