Case 2502374/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mark Harrison v Charltons window cleaning services Ltd Heard: Remotely — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502374/2023
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Legard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mark Harrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Legard, sitting alone, found that the claim of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The respondent's name was amended to Charltons Window Cleaning Services Ltd. The claimant was awarded a total monetary award of £9,424.16, made up of a basic award of £6,708, a compensatory award of £2,316.16 and £400 for loss of statutory rights.
The Recoupment Regulations apply: the prescribed element is £2,316.16, attributable to the period 14 September to 4 November 2023; the amount by which the monetary award exceeds the prescribed element is £4,791.84.
The judgment is brief and reasons beyond the calculations were not provided in the available text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Comprises basic award £6,708, compensatory award £2,316.16, and £400 for loss of statutory rights. Recoupment Regulations apply: prescribed element £2,316.16. | Upheld | — | £9,424 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,424
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,708
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,316
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.