Case 2502407/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Forster v Angela’s Beauty Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502407/2023
- Decision date
- 6 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Forster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that an Order was sent to the claimant on 19 July 2024 giving her an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order sent on 6 March 2024 and that the case had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim heads. The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the Order sent on 6 March 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. The claimant did not make sufficient representations in writing or request a hearing after the Order sent on 19 July 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.