Case 2502429/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Wilson-Bishop v Bradley Hutchinson — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502429/2022
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Wilson-Bishop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Wilson-Bishop, brought a holiday pay claim against Bradley Hutchinson under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The case was heard remotely by CVP at Newcastle CFCTC on 6 March 2023 before Employment Judge Arullendran, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent.
The tribunal held that the holiday pay claim was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant holiday pay in the sum of £429.78 gross, subject to any statutory deductions the respondent might be obliged to make. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
No other claim, legal test, or separate remedy component is set out in the written judgment beyond the holiday pay award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim was for holiday pay pursuant to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £430 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £430
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.