Case 2502449/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Close v Surge Marketing Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502449/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Mrs S Don, Mrs D Newey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Close
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Middlesbrough on 5, 6 and 7 July 2023, Employment Judge Aspden sitting with Mrs S Don and Mrs D Newey unanimously held that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed them. The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed oral reasons, but it records that the decision was announced orally at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. The written record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard post-hearing procedure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not set out the individual allegations; the case listing identifies disability discrimination as one of the complaints dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The written record does not set out the individual allegations; the case listing identifies whistleblowing as one of the complaints dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not set out the individual allegations; the case listing identifies unfair dismissal as one of the complaints dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.