Case 2502472/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs G Kristiansen Second Claimant: Mrs J Evans First v Mr GP Kahlon Second Respondent: Mrs B Kahlon Third Respondent: Teesside Fisheries — 2020

Case reference: 2502472/2019
Decision date: 13 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson Representation
Venue: Teesside Justice Hearing Centre

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs G Kristiansen Second Claimant: Mrs J Evans First

Respondent

Mr GP Kahlon Second Respondent: Mrs B Kahlon Third Respondent: Teesside Fisheries

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing on 3 February 2020 before Employment Judge Johnson at Teesside Justice Hearing Centre, the tribunal recorded that Mrs G Kristiansen's complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered Mr GP Kahlon and Mrs B Kahlon, jointly and severally, to pay £4,926.00 to Mrs Kristiansen.

The tribunal also recorded that Mrs Kristiansen's breach of contract complaint, described as failure to pay notice pay, was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the first and second respondents, jointly and severally, to pay £1,970.40 as compensation for breach of contract.

The judgment likewise states that Mrs J Evans's redundancy payment complaint and breach of contract complaint were well-founded and succeeded. The extracted operative paragraphs contain apparent naming slips, referring to 'Mrs Kristiansen' in one order and 'the first claimant' in another, but the monetary awards are clear: £4,918.15 for redundancy and £3,106.20 for notice pay compensation. The text does not set out detailed reasoning beyond the finding that each complaint was well-founded.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The judgment states that Mrs G Kristiansen's complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. The order is against the first and second respondents jointly and severally.	Upheld	—	£4,926
Breach of contract	The judgment states that Mrs G Kristiansen's breach of contract complaint, described as failure to pay notice pay, was well-founded and succeeded. The order is against the first and second respondents jointly and severally.	Upheld	—	£1,970
Redundancy	The judgment states that Mrs J Evans's complaint of failure to pay a redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. The operative paragraph refers to payment to 'Mrs Kristiansen', which appears to be a naming slip in the extracted text; the amount is recorded here against Mrs Evans's redundancy claim.	Upheld	—	£4,918
Breach of contract	The judgment states that Mrs J Evans's breach of contract complaint, described as failure to pay notice pay, was well-founded and succeeded. The operative paragraph refers to payment to 'the first claimant', which appears to be a naming slip in the extracted text; the amount is recorded here against Mrs Evans's claim.	Upheld	—	£3,106

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £14,921; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.