Case 2502483/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Barry Dixon v Purple Patch Glasgow Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502483/2023
- Decision date
- 2 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Barry Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBarry Dixon brought claims against Purple Patch Glasgow Ltd for unlawful deduction of wages and for outstanding holiday pay under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The hearing took place remotely at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 2 February 2024 before Employment Judge Sweeney, and the Respondent did not appear.
The tribunal found both claims well founded. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £4,038.44 in respect of the unlawful deduction of wages claim and the gross sum of £1,153.80 in respect of the holiday pay claim. The total gross amount due was £5,192.24.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,038 |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states this was a claim for outstanding holiday pay under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.