Case 2502504/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hurst v City Fibre Holdings Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502504/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr G Hurst’s claims of age discrimination and religion or belief discrimination were withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment therefore dismissed those claims and did not contain any findings on their substantive merits.
The decision was issued by Employment Judge Aspden on 15 November 2019. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any separate monetary award or any liability findings beyond the withdrawal-based dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the religion or belief discrimination claim was dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.