Claimant v QGTC Shipping (MI) Inc — 2024

Case reference: 2502506/2023
Decision date: 9 January 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
Venue: Newcastle CFCTC

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

QGTC Shipping (MI) Inc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a remote CVP hearing on 9 January 2024 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The parties were identified as Mr S Singh, the paying party, and QGTC Shipping (MI) Inc, the receiving party.

The only matter determined in the written judgment was the receiving party’s application for costs under Rules 76(1)(a) and (b) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal refused that application.

The record does not set out the oral reasons in full. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no request for written reasons was made there, so no written reasons were provided in the decision record.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Costs application by the receiving party under Rules 76(1)(a) and (b) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013; refused. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.