Case 2502509/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Soakell v Clear Finance Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502509/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss A Soakell
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Soakell began employment with Clear Finance Ltd on 30 June 2014. Her employment transferred to Different Ltd under TUPE on 1 April 2019. At the date of transfer she was owed £20,218.07 in gross unpaid wages, and by the time her employment ended on 17 July 2019 a further £3,434.83 had accrued, giving a total of £23,652.90 unpaid wages.
Neither respondent presented a response. The tribunal dealt with the case under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and held a preliminary hearing on 30 October 2019 after Employment Judge Garnon directed that further information was needed about why the claim was brought against two respondents. The claimant explained that the unpaid wages had built up over time, were due on each pay date, and were to be paid by Mr Bolton.
The tribunal accepted that liability for the unpaid wages outstanding at the date of the relevant transfer passed to Different Ltd under regulation 4(2) of the TUPE 2006 Regulations, and that the later monthly sums remained payable by the transferee employer. It therefore held the unlawful deduction from wages claim against the second respondent to be well founded and ordered payment of £23,652.90 gross.
The tribunal also found that the business effectively closed when the office closed on 17 July 2019, so the claimant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy within section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. She had five continuous years' service, was aged 49 at termination, and earned £384.62 per week. The tribunal held that a statutory redundancy payment was due and ordered the second respondent to pay £2,884.55. The hearing listed for 2 January 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim upheld against the second respondent. The tribunal found that £20,218.07 was outstanding at the date of the TUPE transfer on 1 April 2019 and that a further £3,434.83 accrued before termination on 17 July 2019, making a total of £23,652.90 gross. | Upheld | — | £23,653 |
| Redundancy | Claim upheld against the second respondent as a statutory redundancy payment. The reasons section calculates the payment as £384.62 x 1.5 x 5 = £2,884.65, but the judgment ordering paragraph states £2,884.55; the ordered figure is used here. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,537
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,885
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £23,653
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- regulation 4(2) TUPE 2006
- section 139 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.