Case 2502513/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Walsh v Harley Ultrasound Ltd t/a Vivo — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502513/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Walsh brought complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract, specified in the judgment as notice pay. No response had been entered by Harley Ultrasound Ltd t/a Vivo, so the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that both complaints succeed on liability. It does not contain findings on the underlying merits beyond the Rule 21 disposal, and it states that the amount of compensation due to the claimant will be determined at a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after no response was entered by the respondent; compensation to be determined at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This was the claimant's notice pay claim. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 after no response was entered by the respondent; compensation to be determined at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.