Case 2502520/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Murdie v Surecare — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502520/2019
- Decision date
- 30 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Murdie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short consent judgment before Employment Judge Aspden at North Shields on 6 November 2019. The parties had agreed terms of settlement, and the Tribunal therefore did not determine the substantive issues in the proceedings.
By consent, the Tribunal ordered that the proceedings be stayed until 30 November 2019. The order further provided that, unless either party applied to lift the stay before that date, the proceedings would be treated as dismissed on 30 November 2019 without further order.
The judgment does not record findings on liability, remedy, or any factual dispute, and it does not identify the individual claim heads within the body of the order. The case was therefore disposed of by settlement rather than adjudication.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is a brief consent order and does not set out the substantive claim heads; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment is a brief consent order and does not set out the substantive claim heads; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.