Case 2502521/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Devapal v Short Richardson and Forth Limited In Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502521/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Devapal
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response, and the liquidator had informed the tribunal that he did not intend to admit or defend the claim. The tribunal proceeded on the basis of the information provided by the claimant.
On the collective redundancy claim, the tribunal found that from 5 September 2022 the respondent proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees at its Newcastle office, with dismissals taking effect between 30 September 2022 and 30 November 2022. It found there was no proper warning or consultation with a recognised trade union or with the claimant, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation. The tribunal therefore found a breach of section 188 of the 1992 Act and made the maximum protective award of 90 days' remuneration from 30 September 2022.
On wrongful dismissal, the tribunal found that the claimant had been employed since 21 April 2008 and was summarily dismissed on 30 September 2022, although she was entitled to 12 weeks' notice. It calculated net notice pay at £4,440.36 and deducted £342.03 already received from the Redundancy Payment Service, leaving £4,098.33 net payable. No award was made for pension contributions because that issue was said to be dealt with separately by Clumber Consultancy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal awarded remuneration for a protected period of 90 days from 30 September 2022, but did not state a monetary figure in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay awarded net after deduction of £342.03 received from the Redundancy Payment Service. | Upheld | — | £4,098 |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.