Case 2502528/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Raja v Short Richardson and Forth Limited In Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502528/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Raja
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented her claim on 31 December 2022. The respondent entered voluntary liquidation on 12 January 2023, and the liquidator informed the Tribunal on 2 February 2023 that he did not intend to admit or defend any claim. The judgment was entered under Rule 21 without a hearing because no response had been received from the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that on 5 September 2022 the respondent informed employees it would cease providing legal services after 30 September 2022 and proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees at its Newcastle office as redundant. The first dismissal took effect on 30 September 2022, the last on 30 November 2022, and the claimant was dismissed on 31 October 2022. The tribunal also recorded that there was no proper warning or consultation with a recognised trade union or the claimant, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed within section 188A.
Despite those recorded facts, all claims were dismissed. The tribunal stated that the claimant had been required to provide her witness statement and relevant evidence by 5 June 2023, but none had been received by 4 July 2023. On that basis, and in accordance with Rule 21, the claims under section 189, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, and redundancy pay were found not to be well-founded and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for alleged failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.