Case 2502529/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Sherwood v Short Richardson and Forth Limited In Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502529/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Sherwood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response, and the liquidator had indicated that the claim would not be admitted or defended. The tribunal proceeded on the basis of the claimant’s information.
The tribunal found that the respondent proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees as redundant and that dismissals took effect between 30 September 2022 and 30 November 2022. It found there had been no proper warning or consultation with a recognised trade union or with the claimant, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation. The tribunal therefore found a breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 30 September 2022.
The tribunal also found the wrongful dismissal claim well-founded. It held that the claimant was entitled to four weeks’ contractual notice pay and, after taking account of a partial payment already received from the Redundancy Payment Services, ordered the respondent to pay the remaining net notice pay. No award was made for redundancy pay or holiday pay because the claimant did not wish to pursue those claims, and no award was made for pension contributions because that matter was being dealt with elsewhere.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was upheld. The judgment awards remuneration for a 90-day protected period from 30 September 2022, but does not quantify the amount in the text provided. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Paragraph 8 states the claimant did not wish to pursue the redundancy payment claim, and no award was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The reasons calculate remaining notice pay at £1285.19 net after deducting a partial payment from the Redundancy Payment Services. Paragraph 5 of the judgment states £1258.19 net, which appears inconsistent with paragraph 10. | Upheld | — | £1,285 |
| Holiday pay | Paragraph 8 states the claimant did not wish to pursue the holiday pay claim, and no award was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records a claim for outstanding pension contributions but makes no award because it was being dealt with by Clumber Consultancy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.