Case 2502531/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Thompson v Short Richardson and Forth Limited In Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502531/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because no response was received from the respondent. The respondent had entered voluntary liquidation, and the liquidator informed the tribunal that he did not intend to admit or defend any claim.
The tribunal found that on 5 September 2022 the respondent informed employees that it would cease providing legal services after 30 September 2022 and proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees as redundant. It found there was no proper warning or consultation with a recognised trade union or with the claimant, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A. The tribunal therefore found a breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made the maximum protective award for 90 days beginning on 30 September 2022.
The tribunal also found the wrongful dismissal claim well-founded. It found that the claimant was entitled to 6 weeks' contractual notice, was summarily dismissed on 30 September 2022, and was therefore entitled to £1,727.94 net notice pay. The tribunal made no award for pension contributions, and recorded that the claimant only wished to pursue notice pay and a protective award, so no awards were made in respect of redundancy payment or holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim under section 189 of TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to comply with section 188, resulting in a 90-day protective award from 30 September 2022. The judgment does not quantify the monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as 6 weeks' net notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.