Case 2502534/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Liddle Respondent Community Health Partnership Ltd v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 2502534/2023
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Liddle Respondent Community Health Partnership Ltd
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract, recording that each was not well founded.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay and awarded £739.41 gross. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was well founded and succeeded in the gross sum of £739.41. | Upheld | — | £739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £739
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.