Case 2502578/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dalrymple v JGO Decorators Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502578/2023
- Decision date
- 7 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dalrymple
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr R Dalrymple's claim against JGO Decorators Ltd. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Before striking the claim out, the tribunal wrote to the claimant on 31 January 2024 and gave him an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 8 February 2024 would not go ahead.
This was a procedural disposal only. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying wage claim and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 31 January 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The hearing listed for 8 February 2024 would not take place. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.