Case 2502646/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Richardson v Lee Shears and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502646/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms D Richardson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a letter dated 20 February 2024 giving Ms Richardson an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 January 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Ms Richardson did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Arullendran struck out the claim on 4 March 2024. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action in its reasons; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the order dated 26 January 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.