Case 2502648/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Steele and Mrs Z Willis v Grovewood House Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502648/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Steele and Mrs Z Willis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, headed with case numbers 2502648/2019 and 2502649/2019, names Mrs L Steele and Mrs Z Willis as claimants and Grovewood House Limited as respondent. It is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not set out the underlying facts, evidence, or any merits findings.
The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award are stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the body. This classification is taken from the gov.uk listing category for the case; the judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the body. This classification is taken from the gov.uk listing category for the case; the judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.