Case 2502711/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Jenkyns v Ford Aerospace Ltd Heard: Remotely (by video link) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502711/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Jenkyns
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by video link on 28 and 29 April 2021 before Employment Judge S Shore and issued a liability judgment on 29 April 2021. The claimant was Mr P Jenkyns and the respondent was Ford Aerospace Ltd. The judgment records that the parties did not object to the remote hearing and that it was not practicable to hold a face-to-face hearing because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
On liability, the tribunal rejected the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, stating that it was not well-founded and failed. The judgment does not record any remedy award because the decision was limited to liability.
The tribunal also records that the claimant's sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No further reasoning, findings on remedy, or legal tests are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.