Case 2502768/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Jenkins v Eco HVAC Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502768/2023
- Decision date
- 4 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Jenkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Jenkins appeared in person, accompanied by his mother, and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deduction of wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sums for September 2023 (£1,991), October 2023 (£2,431) and November 2023 up to 17 November 2023 (£880), making £5,302 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found the breach of contract claim, described as a failure to give or pay notice, well-founded and awarded £317 in damages. The redundancy payment claim under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 and the holiday pay claim were dismissed upon withdrawal. The total amount ordered to be paid to the claimant was £5,619.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for gross wages for September 2023 (£1,991), October 2023 (£2,431) and November 2023 up to 17 November 2023 (£880). | Upheld | — | £5,302 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded for failure to give or pay notice. | Upheld | — | £317 |
| Redundancy | Claim under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,619
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.