Case 2502777/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502777/2023
- Decision date
- 20 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- P Chapman, CE Hunter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms M Ramsey, brought claims against County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. The hearing took place at Middlesbrough over several days in October and November 2024 before Employment Judge Aspden with panel members P Chapman and CE Hunter.
The judgment records that none of the claimant's claims were well founded and that the claims were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment states none of the claimant's claims are well founded and the claims are dismissed; no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Gov.uk listing identifies disability discrimination; the judgment states none of the claimant's claims are well founded and the claims are dismissed, without written reasons in the supplied judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.