Case 2502780/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mcgill v AQS Bathrooms — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502780/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Mcgill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. By a letter dated 7 August 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with paragraph 1 of the Employment Judge Sweeney order dated 15 May 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Loy recorded on 4 September 2024 that the claim was struck out. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type or record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the substantive legal type of the underlying claim; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.