Case 2502890/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Wood v Pringle Building Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502890/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge BN Speker
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 6 December 2019 was attended only by the claimant, who was represented by the CAB. Shortly before the hearing the respondent emailed to say that its managing director was ill with a virus and sought a postponement. Employment Judge Speker refused the adjournment because the application was late, there was no medical evidence, the respondent did not appear to be actively opposing the redundancy claim, and delay would prejudice the claimant.
On the evidence from the claimant and the correspondence before the tribunal, the claimant was found entitled to a statutory redundancy payment and to payment for accrued annual leave. For the redundancy award, the tribunal accepted that she had 13 years' employment and applied the statutory maximum weekly pay of £525.00 rather than her weekly wage of £560.00, producing a redundancy payment of £10,237.50.
The tribunal also ordered payment of outstanding annual leave monies. The operative judgment records that sum as £674.87, while the reasons section refers to £674.00. Interest was ordered to be added to both payments from the date of judgment, but the extracted text does not give a quantified interest figure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant entitled to a statutory redundancy payment based on 13 years' employment; it applied the statutory maximum weekly pay of £525.00 against an actual weekly wage of £560.00. Interest was ordered from the date of judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,238 |
| Holiday pay | The operative order states £674.87 for annual leave monies outstanding. The reasons section refers to £674.00, so there is a minor discrepancy in the extracted text. Interest was ordered from the date of judgment. | Upheld | — | £675 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,912
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.